The
Forest Around Us |
Comment By Bill Moore |
“Oh,
to be a small logger!” |
....Now there’s an expression for
you to ponder over “Small Logger.” Down through the years
we’ve heard this symbolism used again and again, and I thought
it was about time we looked into these two enigmatic words and see what
we find. |
er sized camps that have
initiated most of the new trends in logging. Let’s look at the mobile
steel tower for high-lead logging out here in the west. When the Madill
Steel Tower came into being in the early fifties, it took nearly ten years
before the big companies left their wooden spars behind and converted
to steel spars. Amongst the early experiments of the early Madill type
were the Baikie Bros. of Campbell River—and no M & B were they!
The Baikies —Harper, Jack and Wallace — and some other local
loggers finally worked out all the bugs of the new iron contraption and
really gave this industry a giant step forward in the high-lead system
of logging. Thanks to - (How do you say it?) Small Loggers. ....Well, let’s try another tack—how about financing—maybe this ‘Small Logger’ needs small financing to get into the logging business and to stay there. Now, if you had a half a million dollars today you could find some trees to log, you just might become a small logger. And the advice of those in the know would be to be darn careful with that half a million, for it could slip through your hands like a greasy choker, if you didn’t watch your step. Why is logging so expensive? Well, take a look at the price tags on a logging truck, or a log loader or a steel tower. Or figure out your road costs or falling costs. And just make sure—even if it’s a one man show—that you’ve got a good accountant handy—one who knows how to use a sharp pencil. No, it’s no place for ‘small’ talk, this logging business, and the words “Small Logger” have nothing to do with small financing. That half a million could buy a fellow a fine service station, or a real nice meat market or an apartment house. So take a good look, brothers, there is no ‘small way’ in logging. ....I think the term ‘Small Logger’ is also a very poor way of expressing the |
function of the business.
Again, as old Bill Shakespeare once said, “What’s in a name?”
Well, to the uninitiated it could be quite misleading. Over the years
I have had opportunities to see and visit many of these coastal small
sized camps. There is nothing small about the people who earn their livelihood
in some of the lonesome inlets and out-of-the-way places where they carry
on the business of bringing logs out of the forest. It takes toughness
and native ability to stick in some of these areas, cut off from the amenities
of small towns and parts depots. The order of the day in such camps has
always been to make do with what you’ve got and to improvise to
the fullest. You won’t find personnel officers or an abundance of
side foremen in such camps, but instead just enough men to do the job
and a very busy and inventive guy running the show. ....While governments may assist a shoe salesman to buy a lot and build a house in the city, there is no way an ordinary logger could get help to put up a shack on the beach or on a small log float in order to keep his family close to him. Do it yourself brother – and pay your taxes and smile. ....Today there are far less small sized camps on our coast. The timber is mostly held by the large integrated companies. When it was divided up in the late forties and early fifties, to these companies—the writing was on the wall for the majority of small sized independent operators. History will tell us in the years to come of the soundness of their disappearance from the scene. It has been said that the large companies can better look after the governing of the large parcels of forest. I won’t argue the point, but prefer to let history tell us. Keep an open mind on this aspect of “big” and “small.” ....“Can the small logger survive?” I |
82 | British Columbia Lumberman,
April, 1974 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (. page break )
hear this question from year to year, at logging conventions, and
through the media. Let’s phrase it a little differently and see
what we get. How about “Can the small car dealer survive without
the co-operation of Ford and G.M.?” or “Can the small peanut
butter manu-facturer survive without the cooper-ation of General Foods?”
So, “Can the small logger survive without the co-operation of
the big logger?” The answer is always—no. But I would qualify
that answer by adding that if there are to be only big companies, then
our free enterprise system will never survive a governmental socialistic
takeover of such few big ones. It’s only common sense in this
day of the emphasis on a more peoples’ oriented government. |
|
|||
Keep out of the
bight, |
British Columbia Lumberman, April, 1974 | 83 |